Forum .LRN Q&A: Re: .LRN Update
3: Re: .LRN Update (response to 1)
Posted by David Kuczek on 07/26/03 10:12 AM
I just checked out the dotLRN roadmap:
We were once talking about itegrating dotLRN into oacs. dotLRN was supposed to become a configuration option of a standard oacs installation (like dotWRK). Is this still a goal? I didn't see it...
5: Re: .LRN Update (response to 3)
Posted by John Norman on 07/28/03 11:02 AM
I see ACS subsite rewrite in dotLRN 2.0 and ACS subsite integration in dotLRN 2.1, both with "more soon" and "$$" - funding required - against them. I hope this is where dotLRN as a configuration of oacs comes in. We (Cambridge) may not be able to come up with cash, but we could probably commit some effort to this project.
7: Re: .LRN Update (response to 3)
Posted by Alfred Essa on 07/29/03 01:37 AM
David, Yes. That's still the goal. We want to keep dotLRN as light as possible, having only education specific functionality and the rest rolled into oacs.