Forum OpenACS Improvement Proposals (TIPs): Re: TIP #29: Tree_sortkey improvements for performance and concurrency on postgresql

Collapse
2: Re: TIP #29: Tree_sortkey improvements for performance and concurrency on postgresql (response to 1)
Posted by Jeff Davis on 11/14/03 01:39 PM
I would like to call for 2 votes on this:

1. Is the plan acceptible?

2. Should it go in for 5.0?

Obviously I vote yes on both counts and given the short horizon of the 5.0 release I would like to get a quick decision on this.

I am planning to do the work if it's approved...

Collapse
4: Re: TIP #29: Tree_sortkey improvements for performance and concurrency on postgresql (seconded) (response to 2)
Posted by Malte Sussdorff on 11/14/03 04:08 PM
Seconded for both questions. Yes, it is acceptible and Yes, it should go in for 5.0.

Sadly nothing will be done til one week, due to the TIP process rules, as pointed out.

Collapse
5: Re: TIP #29: Tree_sortkey improvements for performance and concurrency on postgresql (seconded) (response to 4)
Posted by Jeff Davis on 11/14/03 06:10 PM
Well, if there are no NO votes I will go ahead and implement/test and just hold off for the week...
Collapse
6: Re: TIP #29: Tree_sortkey improvements for performance and concurrency on postgresql (seconded) (response to 5)
Posted by Tilmann Singer on 11/14/03 06:26 PM
No vetos you wanted to say, not no votes ... confusing the hell out of me ;).

If you can do this for 5.0, great!