Comment for LRN Features in need of Funding.
Hey guys: Isnt this question of features and funding better part of the discussion of the Roadmap? I mean, we could each list which feature we are interested in working on, which is important, but as I understand the import of EC funding right, we would want to figure out the unique contribution .LRN is or might make in the overall e-learning market, and particularly, that part which the EC is concerned with. In part, this is a matter of features. I also wonder if we might think about what the ED would think would interest a European User. Like Malte, I would think that would include the internationalization features. In respect to Blackboard, I would think some attention to the import of Blackboard USERS would be in order: Ive had faculty members refer to Blackboards interface as intuitive and demand that I make .LRN look like Blackboard. Interesting problem sorta like asking if, like the convergence of Mac and Microsoft interfaces (or DreamweaverMX and Homesite), there are emerging standards in LMS system interface design we might identify and hammer out? Where did you find notice of this new EC program, is there a link?