Some comments:
- Don's permissions work went in for 4.6.3 not 5.0.
- I don't see why we would want to pull monitoring into the core - why is that necessary, what's the advantage of having it in core?
- There is too much in the developer ease of use for 5.1.
I am really not sure that a release map with things for "6.0" should be different from unscheduled. In fact having things on the release map without people committed to delivering them seems like a mistake to me. Unless someone has committed to
delivering a given item for a given release my assumption is
that it won't get done; and to be honest even if someone is
committed to delivering something if they are also committed to several other things it's not likely to get done.
I am not sure having a roadmap item for OpenACS community is
sensible and in particular the 5.2 things seem to be mostly marketing and not community.
I think we should add an element for documentation and target
development of particular documents and document sections.