It don't personally really care either way, but I'd like to see a
clear explanation of using either a single package_id column in the
acs_objects table (one-to-many mapping), vs. a mapping table to give a
possibly many-to-many mapping.
Which is the better data model and why? And what are the precise
semantics that OpenACS will ascribe to this field or mapping table?
Note: Not insinuations of performance implications, which is
the better and more useful model. Dirk's thread above from
Oct-Nov 2003 never answered that.
