Is it the general consensus that porting ACS 4.0 packages to the OpenACS is better time spent that packagizing OpenACS 3.2.4 modules?
My first impression is that this is an almost rhetorical question. But then I am wondering if there is some 3.2.4 functionality that will fall through the cracks... (also Civilution has done a pretty robust port of the photodb code that we'll be putting out soon)
I think I personally am up for porting the Spam System and the e-mail handler (and ACS Content by dependancy), and Civilution (me plus 4 other OpenACS developers) would probably ante up and tackle Templating.
After looking at http://www.arsdigita.com/acs-repository/ I find myself wishing for a dependancy tree. For example, Photo Album required Templating and Content Repository.
Where are folks needed the most?
