Forum OpenACS Q&A: Re: When will OpenACS de-support AOLserver 3.x?

Collapse
20: Re: When will OpenACS de-support AOLserver 3.x? (response to 19)
Posted by Bart Teeuwisse on 06/22/04 10:33 PM
C.R.,

I'm using Redhat Linux 7.3 & 8.0 and openssl 0.9.6b or later. I haven't tested Redhat Enterprise 3 enough to vouch for that distrubtion. Do you have reason to belief some distributions and/or openssl versions do not work w/ AOLserver 4.x and nsopenssl 3.x?

/Bart

Collapse
21: Re: When will OpenACS de-support AOLserver 3.x? (response to 20)
Posted by C. R. Oldham on 06/22/04 10:54 PM
On Debian 3.0, kernel 2.4.22 with a backported OpenSSL 0.9.7 we were seeing runaway nsd threads that when stopped with 'gdb attach' seemed to be hanging up in a libssl function.  I thought Scott and I had stomped that one, and I was just checking before we go production with 4.0.5.
Collapse
22: Re: When will OpenACS de-support AOLserver 3.x? (response to 21)
Posted by Steve Manning on 06/23/04 12:35 AM
CR,

Is that 'stomp' in nsopenssl beta 17? I've been running nsopenssl 3beta17 on openssl 0.9.7 on a late series 2.4 kernel and like Bart, I have had no problems tho it is a development server so its not exactly loaded at the moment.

    - Steve

Collapse
23: Re: When will OpenACS de-support AOLserver 3.x? (response to 22)
Posted by C. R. Oldham on 06/23/04 12:48 AM
We are currently running the CVS version, which Scott told me had some fixes over beta 17.  I caught him on AIM the other day to ask if beta 17 might be the production release, and he said he was chasing a couple of other bugs with some other people, and his regular job had been getting in the way.  His goal was to try to finish up and release sometime in the next two weeks.
Collapse
25: Re: When will OpenACS de-support AOLserver 3.x? (response to 23)
Posted by Steve Manning on 06/23/04 09:52 AM
CR

Thats sounds good - we can view beta17 as a release candidate and look forward to the production release so,eti,e soon. All we have to do now is document the config for OACS. As your aware its a bit more sophisticated than v2. 😊

I'm happy to post a snippet of my config if people want to crib it. Its a simple beast just using one sslcontext but it seems to work.

    - Steve