Forum OpenACS Q&A: understanding openacs cvs repository

I was browsing the cvs this morning and saw that the kernel version in 5.1 is newer than the one in 5.1.1

I am updating my site from the repository and I am at version 5.1.1

Am I misunderstanding how it is set and should stay with 5.1 (not 5.1.1)?

How can I profit from the corrected bugs in a stable installation of Openacs?

Is upgrading from the repository; the recommended way or would it be best to put it (again) under svc?

TIA

Yves.

Collapse
Posted by Giancarlo Luxardo on
I guess the answer is that oacs-5-1 is a branch, while openacs-5-1-1-final is a release tag.

It would be nice if someone could provide more details... For instance, how to manage both methods on the same site: upgrade with the installer and update with CVS... this seems difficult because the installer creates new directories which are not under CVS control.

Giancarlo

Collapse
Posted by Jade Rubick on
I'm not sure I understand your questions. How to upgrade depends on what way you've set things up.

If you have an area that is unclear in the install guide, please let us know, and we'll try to fix it.

Collapse
Posted by Giancarlo Luxardo on
I noticed that when an upgrade is run from the openacs repository (with the APM installer), the old package directory is renamed to *.bak and a new directory is created but without the CVS subdirectories, which is confusing.... I realize now that "Upgrade from Local" should have been used if the intention is to work with CVS (which is clear reading the Administrator's Guide).

Anyway, I think that if the upgrade is done from the repository, the latest changes after the release tag are not taken (which was probably the initial question).

Collapse
Posted by Jade Rubick on
Yes, this is a bug and is in bug-tracker. Someone has to volunteer to fix it!
Collapse
Posted by Yves Goldberg on
Thank you very much Giancarlo and Jade for the explanation.

Yves.