Forum OpenACS CMS: Response to Comparisons

Collapse
4: Response to Comparisons (response to 1)
Posted by Adam Farkas on
I've got a nuke site running here. This is on a shared box [FreeBSD on some sort of sketchy clone], with about 30-40 other active sites.

The good:

  • very easy to set up [took all of about 10 minutes]
  • very polished slashdot clone
  • integrated bboard system, similar to UltimateBB
  • Polls
  • Built-in search capability
  • potentially large group of developers who are interested in extending nuke into something more than a slashdot ripoff.
  • Some "add-on" modules available (for example, the DMOZ page at my site.)

The bad:

  • MySQL only. Not a problem for small/silly sites like mine, but I shudder to think of what would happen in a high-volume situation.
  • Not many external modules/extensions, though more may come in the future.
  • Apparent problems with the community -- the main phpnuke.org site was down for almost a week (DB crash?) This was a very embarrassing gaffe for mandrake.

The bottom line: if you need to put up a slashdot clone quickly, you could do worse than nuke. But I wouldn't attempt to push the envelope with it, until the issues mentioned above are addressed.