Forum OpenACS Q&A: Re: XOWiki Plain Page Editor

Collapse
3: Re: XOWiki Plain Page Editor (response to 2)
Posted by Steve Manning on 10/09/08 08:29 PM
Hi Gustaf

Yes thats correct. If I go into the Admin page then click on the Add button for ::xowiki::PlainPage I get the Xinha editor. Same with the ::xowiki::Object.

Collapse
4: Re: XOWiki Plain Page Editor (response to 3)
Posted by Gustaf Neumann on 10/09/08 10:31 PM
yes, i can confirm the bug in this version. Fixed in CVS (branch oacs-5-3), should be as well downloadable via "upgrade from repository" after the next apm rebuild on openacs.org (i.e. tomorrow).

-gustaf neumann

Collapse
5: Re: XOWiki Plain Page Editor (response to 4)
Posted by Steve Manning on 10/10/08 10:06 AM
Thanks Gustaf

Is the fix available as a diff as we have some customisations on this installation and would prefer not to upgrade at the moment?

- Steve

Collapse
6: Re: XOWiki Plain Page Editor (response to 5)
Posted by Gustaf Neumann on 10/10/08 10:10 AM
Collapse
7: Re: XOWiki Plain Page Editor (response to 5)
Posted by Gustaf Neumann on 10/10/08 10:14 AM
btw, you have local customisations to XoWiki 0.60.4? Since i made the change in the "stable branch", there is no need to upgrade to the leading edge version.....
Collapse
8: Re: XOWiki Plain Page Editor (response to 7)
Posted by Steve Manning on 10/10/08 10:54 AM
OK thats great thanks. I'll check it on our staging server first.

BTW the live site is here www.fancydress.com with three xowiki instances running :)

Collapse
9: Re: XOWiki Plain Page Editor (response to 8)
Posted by Steve Manning on 10/10/08 11:19 AM
One caveat on this change. I had to add

# Default Xinha Instance
set rich_text_spec {richtext(richtext),nospell,optional
{label Content}
{html {style {width: 100%}}}
{javascript {xinha_config.script_dir = 'wiki'}}
{options....}
}}}

set widget_specs [list *,text $rich_text_spec]

to the root object to get the Xinha to work for the non-plain pages.

Collapse
10: Re: XOWiki Plain Page Editor (response to 9)
Posted by Gustaf Neumann on 10/10/08 02:03 PM
Oops, you are right. This is fixed as well in the oacs-5-3 branch. The richtext editor handling is quite different in the head branch, so it is no simple backport.

anyhow, ... a fancy site with fancy dressings!

-gustaf neumann