Using ROR to document OpenACS would be the ultimate in not eating one's own dogfood, seems to me. From a PR perspective, wouldn't this be worse for OpenACS than not having documentation at all? If the wiki package needs work, that seems to be what needs doing first, eh?
Dave, you created the wiki package -- are you still maintainer? Wiki isn't currently in Bugtracker or on the Packages page, but it should be both places. -- I just added it so bugs/features can be dealt with.
