Let's consider what works well as well as what is "wrong."
We need to compile a list of requirements, to help measure what is going in the right direction, what needs work, and what is irrelevant.
A comprehensive summary of the documentation requirements overlaps with openacs.org site requirements: https://openacs.org/doc/current/docbook-primer.html#docs-requirements
Should this significant community input distilled from all related discussions in the forums to July 2003 be overlooked in this process?
Ben, you are right. Following project management phases would be helpful in this redesign, whether or not the project manager package gets used. Here's an overview of PM phases in the documentation project context: https://openacs.org/doc/current/docbook-primer.html#docs-managing