The TIP rules, as I understand them, don't have this requirement[1].
OK, fine, we relaxed that requirement (it was discussed in the beginning).
Great, you get to start a TIP.
It doesn't mean you get to hack core without TIP'ing.
I don't think I'm special. I really didn't think this social networking thing was worth distracting the OCT from other work. It seems like a very small, incrementally positive thing. Nothing more. As an afterthought, based on your reaction, I'm wondering if there is some kind of MIT/facebooky vs. MIT.alt feud thing motivating this dialog.
Oh, good grief, Torben, stuff a sock in the conspiracy theory orifice.
You've been told you need to TIP before adding functionality to core.
This is not new.
I'm fairly confident, yet remain open-minded and do not assume to understand all core-developer issues
This statement alone justifies our policy that changes of this sort require a TIP.
Create or show me the package, and I'll move it there.
That's not how it works, Torben.
Remove your commits. We'll discuss afterwards if you choose to TIP.