Thanks, that's important information. Now I need to decide, because I do need 'active subsites with different membership groups'.
However, with dotLRN being brought up, I would like to know which way OpenACS is floating?
Judging from the answer, Ben's position and the enthusiasm with which dotLRN has been embraced by the active community, I could guess that OpenACS might be adopting the dotLRN kernel-core after all packages have been ported. Then, with dotLRN being the Office-like 'suite of packages' for the teaching-school community, I can envision OpenACS to be the mother from which all (other) communities evolve. But how do insiders picture the future relation between dotLRN and OpenACS, before I hop on the dotLRN train?
