"I personally believe, .LRN should move from the current “certified/not certified” terminology to OpenACS’ “Maturity Levels” so that new code can be “released” earlier under a low maturity and still qualify to be evaluated in these types of studies." -- Caroline Meeks
I agree with this but there is no infrastructure in OpenACS to support this. The OCT and the leadership of OpenACS needs to specify clearly what these maturity levels mean and how they would be enforced. At the package level the current state of affairs is a hodge podge of random contributions with no maintainers and no documentation.
