Forum .LRN Q&A: Re: Report: An Evaluation of Open Source CMS Stressing Adaptation Issues.

Malte, that openbrr link is quite useful (and supports many of my prior arguments about adding an end-user and an admin forum to this site).

The BRR criteria should be expressed in the Why Openacs document (with supporting metrics and their references).

The above proposed packages-report seems like an immediate way to implement the essentials of BRR metrics given that this software/community has a narrow set of highly valued core development objectives (scalable, extendible, secure etc) that naturally reduce the selection of remaining metrics to about 7 --their suggested maximum to use when screening.

Supplying the data via a packages-report also recognizes that any specific BRR number is ultimately subjective to a particular evaluation process. This software is more likely to get into any related evaluation when the data is easily available.