Forum OpenACS Development: Response to Open 4.6 items & project status
41: Response to Open 4.6 items & project status (response to 1)
Posted by Neophytos Demetriou on 08/13/02 03:10 PM
Luke, I think that edit-this-page is a similar case to the bug-tracker, right? I think we need to seriously address my posts above in this thread so that we are sure that the packages that "belong" into the OpenACS project are subject to the governing rules and processes of the OpenACS project. The main issue is not bug-tracker or edit-this-page but any future packages, e.g. from .LRN that made clear they are going to be a separate project in terms of governance and so on...
"... what was first submitted to as a convenience, was afterwards claimed as a right" -- Thomas Paine
I've asked something relevant in my latest post to the "dotLRN governance rules" thread: https://openacs.org/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=0005cM&topic_id=15&topic=dotLRN%20Development