Forum OpenACS Development: Response to Open 4.6 items & project status

Collapse
Posted by Don Baccus on
(though I'd understand and accept if they want to keep the home page on a musea.net URL just to get a little credit from their investment and gift to the community).
I've been planning to start an entire new thread on this issue once the dust settles on 4.6 planning and dotLRN governance.

How do we give proper credit to companies who give code back?

I don't want to muddle this thread with that issue but we need to talk about it in another thread soon. MIT/OF gave tons back (new-portal, forums, etc), Musea's given code, Furfly the first ecommerce port etc etc.

Please, though, not here ... this should be a separate thread in our general forum.