Forum OpenACS Development: Response to Open 4.6 items & project status

Collapse
Posted by Samir Joshi on
Ben wrote : Samir: unless you've totally rewritten FAQ, we ported it to PG correctly (see the dotlrn.openforce.net site running FAQ on PG).

Ben, as I noted in my earlier post in this thread, Dan Chak has committed code I wrote to OpenACS 4.5 HEAD branch, that is what probably you are referring to. I have not rewritten it after that. AFIK, Robert Locke's version is better at least in that it gets rid of custom privileges, and it is upto him ( I sent him the code) and gatekeeper(s) to merge the two versions.