Forum OpenACS Q&A: Response to Request for Comments and Discussion: Building a Leaner, Meaner OpenACS with MIST
52: Response to Request for Comments and Discussion: Building a Leaner, Meaner OpenACS with MIST (response to 1)
Posted by Alfred Essa on 10/05/02 10:34 PM
A note of clarification. I said: "Many of us are trying to pick up the pieces after OpenForce pulled out of dotLRN with a lot of unfinished business."
From this, no one should draw the implication that OpenForce failed to deliver its contractual obligation to Sloan. OpenForce was contracted by Sloan to build SloanSpace v2. It has done so. We are live with SloanSpace v2 and we are very pleased with the product.
I was referring to dotLRN, which is an open source effort in which many of us participate. I apologize if the distinction was not clear.