Forum OpenACS Development: Re: [OACS 5.10.0] permission::permission_p_not_cached - Changed from returning integer to char

Thank you for your quick answer, Gustaf.

And I think in our case it is more on the adp side since most of the examples in [1] were not unary, so with a glance the true/false validation wasn't used and instead we went with the eq/ne validation.

I still think it will be important to make the notice in the release notes for the 5.10.0 release [2] or at least make it clear since while I was searching for an answer I wasn't able to find it.

Again, thank you very much for your explanation.

[1] https://openacs.org/doc/acs-templating/tagref/if
[2] https://openacs.org/doc/release-notes

Good points. i've updated the documentation page slightly and added a hint to the forthcoming release notes.
Thank you for considering my comments. I saw the update in the documentation already.
Good suggestions are always welcome!