Forum .LRN Q&A: Re: Accessibility improvements for 2.4

Collapse
4: Re: Accessibility improvements for 2.4 (response to 1)
Posted by Dave Bauer on 05/20/08 04:27 PM
Good point! If its just dotlrn packages, and are bug fixes. The only question is how much testing is required.
Collapse
5: Re: Accessibility improvements for 2.4 (response to 4)
Posted by Emmanuelle Raffenne on 05/20/08 04:39 PM
They are mainly changes in the markup and CSS so the testing would be to check that it's still valid html strict, the layout is correct in the most used browsers, say IE FF Safari Opera?, and the CSS are valid.

Since the list is long and I have only 1 week, I won't have time to do all of it but I'll try to do as much as I can.

Collapse
6: Re: Accessibility improvements for 2.4 (response to 5)
Posted by Don Baccus on 05/20/08 05:34 PM
We'll discuss this at honchos, but my thinking is to do as much as you can, and after one week we can discuss releasing .lrn 2.4.0 beta1 (assuming we can release core this week!) or spending more time if necessary.
Collapse
7: Re: Res: Re: Accessibility improvements for 2.4 (response to 5)
Posted by Raúl Morales Hidalgo on 05/20/08 05:49 PM
I'm re-ordering assessment portlet for our install, I'll keep in mind to comply with your above points. I'll post my changes on the forums later this week.