Forum OpenACS Development: NaviServer "breaks" under high load
I've got a strange case here: A ]po[ server "breaks" (=hangs until a 'killall -9 nsd' restart) under high load (~60 "active users").
The last lines before the incident are:
[27/Jul/2018:17:30:09][56010.7f6a7206d700][-driver:nssock-] Notice: NsEnsureRunningConnectionThreads wantCreate 1 waiting 16 idle 0 current 74 [27/Jul/2018:17:30:11][56010.7f6a7206d700][-driver:nssock-] Notice: NsQueueConn wantCreate 1 waiting 17 idle 0 current 74 [27/Jul/2018:17:30:14][56010.7f6a7206d700][-driver:nssock-] Notice: NsQueueConn wantCreate 1 waiting 18 idle 0 current 75 [...] [27/Jul/2018:17:30:35][56010.7f6a7206d700][-driver:nssock-] Notice: NsQueueConn wantCreate 1 waiting 34 idle 0 current 91 [27/Jul/2018:17:30:42][56010.7f6a7206d700][-driver:nssock-] Notice: NsQueueConn wantCreate 1 waiting 35 idle 0 current 92 [27/Jul/2018:17:30:46][56010.7f6a7206d700][-driver:nssock-] Notice: NsQueueConn wantCreate 1 waiting 36 idle 0 current 93From what I can understand from the source code there are loads (36) threads "waiting". What could be the cause? Is the issue due to the maxconnections < maxthreads? Here is the relevant section of the config.tcl:
ns_param maxconnections 100 ns_param maxthreads 128 ns_param minthreads 32 ns_param connsperthread 1000 ns_param highwatermark 80I'll just increase the number of maxconnections and maxthreads for now.
first of all, unless you are running the application on a raspberry pi, ~60 users is no load to be concerned of on a reasonable machine, we have servers with several thousand active users (clicking in a time window of 2 minutes). ... but users are not users, when these user fire e.g every second a request taking a minute, every server will run out of resources soon. So, in order to assess the situation of this server properly, more details are needed.
Concerning the configuration parameters:
- maxconnections: having maxthreads higher than maxconnections never makes sense, NaviServer should warn you about this on startup
- maxthreads: 128 is quite a large value! On the setup with 2000 concurrent users, we have in the default pool minthreads and maxthreads set to 25. Make sure to have enough db connections configured in your database setup. How many cores are available in this setup?
- connsperthead: unless you have major data-leaks in the application, increase connsperthread to 10000; this is not relevant for the issue.
- database: You might run out of db-connections (threads will be hanging around idle waiting for db-connections) or simply to slow or to many queries.
- slow clients: when NaviServer is not properly configured, the speed of client connections for uploads and downloads might cause long blocking connection threads. This will not happen, when spooler and writer threads are properly configured.
- setup without multiple thread pools: In case, a site admin knows to have several very slow requests (taking each multiple seconds) the recommended setup is to have multiple thread pools, such that the slow requests are directed to special pools, but no other users are harmed.
The avgwaittime is the average time for obtaining a db-handle, and avgsqltime is the average time of an SQL query.
The same page provides as well information about the configured pools, like e.g. from the default connection thread pool:
When the queue time goes up, you should become alert. A high filter time is an indicator of permission problems, the avg runtime gives hints about the need of splitting connection pools.
Below, you see information about multiple connection pools, where e.g. the "monitor" pools is used on this site for monitoring applications (like munin) and for admins to adjust the setup at runtime when necessary (ds/shell, etc.)
Hope this helps!
> ~60 users is no load to be concerned of
I've read about your impressive WU-Wien installation...
However, with ~2.500 "total users" (using ]po[ at least once a week for hour logging, as opposed to these ~60 "active users" in the 2 min interval), also the number of "activities" (projects, tickets and tasks) go up more or less linearly. Most pages algorithms with at least n*log(n) complexity, so that overall load rises with at least n^3*log(n) with the number of users, probably even higher.
Right, this didn't make sense...
OK. I've now set maxthreads = minthreads = 32 and highwatermark=100 in order to disable dynamic thread creation.
The server has 8 physical cores. The "hang" occurred during re-spawning threads if I understood it right. So maybe just disabling dynamic thread creation might fix the situation.
> database connections
We've got 15, 5 and 5 for pools 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
I'll have a detailed look at DB-connection stats next Friday.
It seems "hangs" have occurred so far only Fridays, because users seem to log hours for the week on Friday. Logging hours initiates some complex cache maintenance PG-triggers: Logged hours will create "cost items" which are attached to the respective activity. These items are rolled-up (aggregated) the project-activity-hierarchy towards the main project as part of a cache for the most important financial figures per project.
as a reference, we haven on learn@wu on the year average ~10k different users per day.
The "hang" occurred during re-spawning threads
Probably the server was not "hanging", but just hopelessly overloaded; if there is a single connection pool in use, a fresh request has to wait, until all waiting jobs are processed. In such situations, many users press eagerly reload, worsening the situation even more, and nobody sees finishing pages; even worse, with a single connection pool, even formerly fast requests (also static files) have to wait for the slow requests - so multiple connection pools are highly recommended for sites with high load and slow requests. The message in the error log said that the server would like to create more threads, but it was already at max.
You will need more db-connections: when using OpenACS most likely every active connection thread will require at least one DB connection, same is true for background processing. So, with 32 connection threads, you would need 32+ db connections for pool1...
Nope! I had top and atop running exactly at that moment, and the load was pretty normal (some 150% CPU, out of 800% available), and atop didn't show too many I/O operations neither.
There was also no noticeable slow-down of the server in the 30-60 seconds before the "hang". I was monitoring performance using your excellent /request-monitor/...
I'll let you know how things are going next Friday!
Thanks a lot!