Forum OpenACS Forum Summaries: Q&A 2004-10-06

Collapse
2: Q&A 2004-10-06 (response to 1)
Posted by Jade Rubick on

OpenACS Q&A Forum Summary: 10/6/2004

(Note: Q&A Forum summaries are made on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. Comments on editorial style welcomed.  If you really want everything, read the whole forum yourself.)

Website

Community

  • David Cotter volunteered to count the votes. There was some other discussion of how much work the volunteer commitment is. We still are looking for more volunteers, I believe.

Discussion

  • Andrei Popov said that Jeffrey's post is a good summary of what is wrong and what should be done in the future with OpenACS's CMS efforts.
  • Alfred Werner says his biggest complaint with OpenACS is how hard it is to set up, and suggest we do the unthinkable: use normal Linux conventions in where we set things up, and use the various Linux distributions package installs (RPM and apt-get) to install OpenACS. He suggests we make it much easier to install OpenACS. Bart Teeuwisse says RPMs can be built quite easily, and they can even take advantage of tools such as daemontools, which give the user a lot of control. Bart has worked on building RPMs of OpenACS. The hardest part is that the Tcl that comes with Redhat isn't thread-safe, but we could distribute a separate version that is thread-safe. The version that comes with Debian is thread-safe, according to Dave Bauer. Alfred Werner asked Jeff Hobbs if threaded Tcl can be the default for RedHat in the future. Bart also reported that he has made an RPM for tDOM. Jade Rubick asked for a volunteer to organize what has been done and what needs to be done.

Looking for help (and not getting it)

Looking for help (and getting it)

OpenACS Administration

OpenACS Programming (should go in Dev Forum?)

Developmental statistics

Links