Comparison of the CTRL Surveys Package vs. the OACS Assessment Package
A comparison of features in the CTRL Surveys package and the OACS Assessment package.
The list is intended to go from simple features to more complex features.
|File Upload||no - want to add soon||yes|
|Survey/ Section/ Question copying||yes (a.k.a. copy)||Assessment also allows import and export using the IMS QTI standard|
|Grouping of Questions||yes||yes (a.k.a. sections)|
Surveys uses tasks to allow users to take an instance of a survey. Policies (e.g. interval active, # of times allowed to take) are tied to a task as opposed to a survey.
|Not sure what "tasks" mean in this context. Assessment has sessions (a.k.a. attempts)... is that what this is?|
|Policies||There are quite a few policies designed. Not sure how many are implemented.||What are policies?|
|Reports||Basic reports||cvs export and very basic reporting of multiple choice questions|
|XML Output||yes||yes (IMS QTI)|
|Page Flow :)|
uses pages as opposed to sections
don't like item, events
uses triggers as opposed to events
does assess. use questions instead of items?